Celestia

Allocation Structure & Vesting Schedule
The tokenomics of TIA are presented with a fragmented allocation matrix that aggregates to well over 100 % when the individual line items are summed, indicating overlapping or duplicated entries across categories. Reported figures include two distinct “Team” allocations (17.6 % and 22.5 %), two “Ecosystem” buckets (26.8 % and 16.3 %), dual “Community” shares (20 % and 12.1 %), and two “Investors” slices (19.7 % and 15.9 %). Additional categories listed are “Other” (31.1 % and 30.6 %), “Treasury” (18 %), and “Airdrop” (12.8 %). Because the source data does not clarify whether these percentages are cumulative, mutually exclusive, or represent separate tranche releases, the precise distribution of the total supply remains ambiguous. Moreover, the dataset provides no concrete vesting terms, cliff periods, or duration schedules for any stakeholder group, leaving the timing of token releases largely undocumented. This lack of granular vesting information hampers the ability to model future supply dynamics with confidence.

Upcoming Unlocks, Risks & Confidence
In the absence of disclosed vesting calendars, it is impossible to pinpoint exact unlock dates for the sizable team and investor allocations, which together could represent upwards of 40 % of the total token pool. Should these holdings be subject to standard multi‑year linear vesting, the market impact may be gradual; however, the ambiguity raises the risk of sudden supply shocks if large tranches become liquidable earlier than anticipated. The overlapping allocation figures also suggest potential double‑counting, which could mask hidden concentration risk—particularly if “Other” and “Ecosystem” categories include strategic partners or future fundraising rounds. Given the contradictory data points and the missing vesting schedule, our overall confidence in the token’s supply outlook is assessed as Medium. This rating reflects that while multiple high‑confidence sources confirm the existence of the major allocation categories, the inconsistencies and lack of temporal detail limit the precision of any forward‑looking supply or price impact analysis. Investors should monitor official communications for clarified tokenomics and vesting disclosures before making exposure decisions.