CYBER

Allocation Structure & Vesting Schedule
The publicly disclosed tokenomics for CYBER show a fragmented allocation picture. High‑confidence entries allocate roughly 53 % of the supply to “Investors” (22.84 % + 2 × 2.73 % + 25.1 %), 13.64 % to the Team, 9.89 % to the Treasury, and 9.09 % to an “Other” bucket. Community allocations appear in three separate lines (9.09 % + 6 % + 11.27 % ≈ 26.36 %), while Ecosystem reserves are split between 8.18 % and 4.55 % (≈ 12.73 %). Adding these figures exceeds 100 % (≈ 125 %), indicating overlapping categories or reporting errors. Crucially, the dataset provides no vesting terms, cliff periods, or duration details for any stakeholder group, leaving the release schedule opaque. The lack of a defined vesting framework hampers the ability to model supply dynamics accurately.

Upcoming Unlocks, Risks & Confidence
Because vesting parameters are absent, specific unlock dates and volumes cannot be projected with confidence. Potential risk vectors stem from the ambiguous allocation totals—over‑allocation may mask undisclosed reserves that could be released abruptly, exerting downward pressure on price. Investor‑heavy distribution (over half of the supply) also raises the specter of coordinated sell‑offs if market conditions deteriorate. The data inconsistencies and missing vesting schedules contribute to a medium confidence rating for this analysis; while the high‑confidence source tags suggest the percentages are reliable, the internal contradictions and lack of temporal release information limit the robustness of any forward‑looking supply forecasts. Investors should seek clarified tokenomics from the project team before making allocation‑sensitive decisions.