Arkham

Allocation Structure & Vesting Schedule
ARKM’s tokenomics are dominated by a large “Ecosystem” tranche, reported at 37.3 % of the total supply. However, the source data lists this category twice, effectively inflating the apparent allocation. Similarly, the “Team” share appears both as 20 % and 22.5 %, while “Investors” and “Foundation” each appear twice (17.5 % and 17.2 % respectively). When de‑duplicated, the core allocation likely consists of: Ecosystem (~37 %), Team (~21 % average), Investors (~17.5 %), Foundation (~17.2 %), Treasury (18 %), Airdrop (12.8 %), Advisors (3 %) and a residual “Other” (5 %). The overlapping entries suggest the published breakdown may be preliminary or subject to revision. No explicit vesting terms, cliff periods, or duration schedules are provided for any category, which limits the ability to model future supply dynamics with precision. In the absence of a disclosed vesting framework, analysts must assume standard industry practices (e.g., 12‑month cliff and 24‑36‑month linear release for team and advisors) but note that these are speculative.

Upcoming Unlocks, Risks & Confidence
Because ARKM’s on‑chain vesting contracts have not been publicly audited or linked to a transparent schedule, concrete unlock dates cannot be identified. The lack of disclosed timelines creates uncertainty around potential supply shocks, especially for the sizable ecosystem and treasury pools that could be released in bulk once the project reaches certain milestones. Concentration risk is another concern: even after de‑duplication, the combined ecosystem, treasury, and team allocations exceed 70 % of the total supply, meaning a relatively small group of stakeholders could influence market liquidity. Data inconsistencies (duplicate entries, missing token amounts) further erode confidence in the token’s governance transparency. Accordingly, the overall confidence in the allocation and vesting assessment is Medium—sufficient to outline the broad distribution but insufficient to draw firm conclusions about future unlock events or price impact without additional, verifiable information. Investors should monitor forthcoming disclosures, on‑chain vesting contract audits, and any governance proposals that clarify the release schedule.